Change in direction for the class

I realized after the last class (on factor analysis) that I was doing the class a disservice. The mathematical underpinnings of measures of association, regression, factor analysis etc are not what you guys need most. There are kind of three ways of teaching a course like this. 

Approach 1. In-depth examination of research methods from a formal, mathematical perspective. So formal measurement theory, vectors and matrices, how correlation really works, the underlying math of factor analysis, and so on.
Approach 2. In-depth, hands-on workshop on how to use the main techniques of data collection, construction and analysis in the social sciences. Mostly about the software and the actual nuts and bolts.
Approach 3. Survey of the components of a research project. Exposure to key concepts, such as measurement, validity, reliability etc, as well data collection techniques and data analysis techniques. Emphasis on what they are and what they are used for, but not how they work. 
I intended the course to be a combination of Approach 1 and Approach 2.  But now I am going to reorganize things to be about 70% Approach 3, and 30% Approach 2. My sense of aesthetic purity says go 100% Approach 3, but I can’t resist showing you some tools you can use to analyze real data. It is too much fun.
Of course, it is hard to let go of the math stuff too. So my approach is going to be “if you don’t ask, i won’t tell”. But I hope you do ask about the mathematical nuts and bolts underneath the techniques, and I will explain.
Advertisements

2 Responses to “Change in direction for the class”

  1. Josh Says:

    For what it is worth, I liked the in-depth view of factor analysis. It is challenging to get it all in in one class session, but I like knowing how this stuff works so I am better prepared to use it in the future (factor analysis).

    Having a broad exposure to multiple techniques is important as well, so I can see the trade off. But, having some classes where we dive in to the math is helpful as well. At least for me.

    Josh

  2. STEVE BORGATTI Says:

    So, after I saw your comment, I edited the post to emphasize that I would love it if people do raise questions about how the methods really work, and I will explain in full depth whenever possible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: